PLEASANT 2ND WINE
I just reported this same label although vintage wise it was 2009. A year apart but loads of difference. Obviously 09 was a fabulous vintage, whereas 08 Parker initially rated it highly but was totally wrong about it.
This second wine still performed decently. Nose was light and woody, although with some slight sweaty armpit. Content wise it was pleasant and easy drinking, quite creamy, fruit is good but lacked tannins to make this last a lifetime.